Skip to content

Michigan Journal of Race & Law

– – – – – The University of Michigan Law School – – – – –
  • Home
  • Boards
    • Masthead
    • Advisory Board
  • About
  • Issues
    • Volume 26, Special Issue
    • Volume 26, Issue 1
    • Volume 25, Issue 2
    • Volume 25, Issue 1
    • Archives
    • Comments
  • Blog
  • News
  • Symposia
    • Volume 27 Symposium
    • A More Human Dwelling Place: Reimagining the Racialized Architecture of America (2018)
    • Innocent Until Proven Poor: Fighting the Criminalization of Poverty (2016)
    • The Highest Tribute: MJR&L at 20 (2014)
    • Inhumane and Ineffective: Solitary Confinement in Michigan and Beyond (2013)
    • Reinventing the Wheel: Why Broken Cities Stay Broken (2010)
    • From Proposition 209 to Proposal 2 (2008)
    • Going Back to Class: The Reemergence of Critical Race Theory (2005)
    • Separate But Unequal: The Status of America’s Public Schools (2002)
    • Identities in the Year 2000 and Beyond (2000)
      • Constitution-Making in South Africa (1997)
    • Toward a New Civil Rights Vision (1995)
  • Submit
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
    • Alumni

judge easterbrook

COMMENT: Resolving the 7th Circuit’s Split on Bringing Class-Of-One Equal Protection Claims

by MJR&L on February 23, 2015April 9, 2015

By Jacob Hogg Associate Editor, Vol. 20 The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment is one of the most celebrated and discussed topics in Constitutional Law. This clause states “No State shall [. . .] deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”[1] Law students generally learn about this […]

My Tweets
Create a website or blog at WordPress.com
  • Follow Following
    • Michigan Journal of Race & Law
    • Join 62 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Michigan Journal of Race & Law
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar