Skip to content

Michigan Journal of Race & Law

– – – – – The University of Michigan Law School – – – – –
  • Home
    • New Journal Articles
  • Boards
    • Masthead
    • Advisory Board
  • About
  • Issues
    • Volume 25, Issue 2
    • Volume 25, Issue 1
    • Archives
    • Comments
  • Blog
  • News
  • Symposia
    • A More Human Dwelling Place: Reimagining the Racialized Architecture of America (2018)
    • Innocent Until Proven Poor: Fighting the Criminalization of Poverty (2016)
    • The Highest Tribute: MJR&L at 20 (2014)
    • Inhumane and Ineffective: Solitary Confinement in Michigan and Beyond (2013)
    • Reinventing the Wheel: Why Broken Cities Stay Broken (2010)
    • From Proposition 209 to Proposal 2 (2008)
    • Going Back to Class: The Reemergence of Critical Race Theory (2005)
    • Separate But Unequal: The Status of America’s Public Schools (2002)
    • Identities in the Year 2000 and Beyond (2000)
    • Constitution-Making in South Africa (1997)
    • Toward a New Civil Rights Vision (1995)
  • Submit
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
    • Alumni

Arizona v. Youngblood

COMMENT: Deportation of Possibly Exculpatory Witnesses Should be Per Se Bad Faith

by MJR&L on January 22, 2016January 22, 2016

By Andrew VanEgmond Associate Editor, Vol. 21 I.         Deportation of Witnesses with Exculpatory Evidence: The Circuit Split The Circuit split analyzed in this Comment turns on whether or not to adopt a per se rule regarding government bad faith during a determination of whether the government’s deportation of an alien witness reaches the level of […]

My Tweets
Create a website or blog at WordPress.com